Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16452408›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006

CcpA causes repression of the phoPR promoter through a novel transcription start site, P(A6).

Ankita Puri-Taneja, Salbi Paul, Yinghua Chen, F Marion Hulett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Removing carbon catabolite repression inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ankita Puri-TanejaLaboratory for Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 900 S. Ashland Ave. (M/C 567), Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.
Salbi Paul
Yinghua Chen
F Marion Hulett
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

CLONING AND CHARACTERIZING B SUBTILIS APASE GENESR01GM033471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HULETT, F MARION · 1985 to 2009
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 33471NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bacillus subtilis PhoPR two-component system is directly responsible for activation or repression of Pho regulon genes in response to phosphate deprivation. The response regulator, PhoP, and the histidine kinase, PhoR, are encoded in a single operon with a complex promoter region that contains five known transcription start sites, which respond to at least two regulatory proteins. We report here the identification of another direct regulator of phoPR transcription, carbon catabolite protein A, CcpA. This regulator functions in the presence of glucose or other readily metabolized carbon sources. The maximum derepression of phoPR expression in a ccpA mutant compared to a wild-type stain was observed under excess phosphate conditions with glucose either throughout growth in a high-phosphate defined medium or in a low-phosphate defined medium during exponential growth, a growth condition when phoPR transcription is low in a wild-type strain due to the absence of autoinduction. Either HPr or Crh were sufficient to cause CcpA dependent repression of the phoPR promoter in vivo. A ptsH1 (Hpr) crh double mutant completely relieves phoPR repression during phosphate starvation but not during phosphate replete growth. In vivo and in vitro studies showed that CcpA repressed phoPR transcription by binding directly to the cre consensus sequence present in the promoter. Primer extension and in vitro transcription studies revealed that the CcpA regulation of phoPR transcription was due to repression of P(A6), a previously unidentified promoter positioned immediately upstream of the cre box. Esigma(A) was sufficient for transcription of P(A6), which was repressed by CcpA in vitro. These studies showed direct repression by CcpA of a newly discovered Esigma(A)-responsive phoPR promoter that required either Hpr or Crh in vivo for direct binding to the putative consensus cre sequence located between P(A6) and the five downstream promoters characterized previously.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCarbonCulture MediaDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataPhosphatesProtein KinasesRepressor ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription Initiation SiteBacterial ProteinsCarboncatabolite control proteins, bacteriaCulture MediaDNA-Binding ProteinsPhoP protein, BacteriaPhoR protein, BacteriaPhosphatesProtein KinasesRepressor ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16452408
PMCPMC1367233
OpenAlexW2164165971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.