Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16451601›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2005

Performance comparison of two-point linkage methods using microsatellite markers flanking known disease locations.

Mark W Logue, Andrew W George, M Anne Spence, Veronica J Vieland

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark W LogueCenter for Statistical Genetics Research, College of Public Health, Roy J & Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. mark-logue@uiowa.edu
Andrew W George
M Anne Spence
Veronica J Vieland

Funding

SAMPLING MODELS AND METHODS FOR COMPLEX GENETIC DISEASESR01MH052841 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI VIELAND, VERONICA J. · 1995 to 2004
$1.1M
SAMPLING MODELS AND METHODS FOR COMPLEX GENETIC DISEASESR55MH052841 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI VIELAND, VERONICA J. · 1994 to 1994
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH52841NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 simulated data presents an interesting, challenging, and plausible example of a complex disease interaction in a dataset. This paper summarizes the ease of detection for each of the simulated Kofendrerd Personality Disorder (KPD) genes across all of the replicates for five standard linkage statistics. Using the KPD affection status, we have analyzed the microsatellite markers flanking each of the disease genes, plus an additional 2 markers that were not linked to any of the disease loci. All markers were analyzed using the following two-point linkage methods: 1) a MMLS, which is a standard admixture LOD score maximized over theta, alpha, and mode of inheritance, 2) a MLS calculated by GENEHUNTER, 3) the Kong and Cox LOD score as computed by MERLIN, 4) a MOD score (standard heterogeneity LOD maximized over theta, alpha, and a grid of genetic model parameters), and 5) the PPL, a Bayesian statistic that directly measures the strength of evidence for linkage to a marker. All of the major loci (D1-D4) were detectable with varying probabilities in the different populations. However, the modifier genes (D5 and D6) were difficult to detect, with similar distributions under the null and alternative across populations and statistics. The pooling of the four datasets in each replicate (n = 350 pedigrees) greatly improved the chance of detecting the major genes using all five methods, but failed to increase the chance to detect D5 and D6.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingDiseaseGenetics, PopulationHumansMicrosatellite Repeats

Identifiers

PMID16451601
PMCPMC1866794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.