Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16451093›Full record

ReviewDrugs2006

Emerging selective estrogen receptor modulators: special focus on effects on coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women.

Tatjana Elène Vogelvang, Marius Jan van der Mooren, Velja Mijatovic, Peter Kenemans

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. SERMs and SERMs with estrogen for postmenopausal osteoporosis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2010
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of osteoporosis.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2010
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Raloxifene for older women: a review of the literature.Clinical interventions in aging · 2008
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatjana Elène VogelvangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Project Aging Women, Institute for Cardiovascular Research-Vrije Universiteit, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marius Jan van der Mooren
Velja Mijatovic
Peter Kenemans
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menopause, regardless of age at onset, is associated with a marked increase in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. On the basis of epidemiological studies that demonstrated mainly positive effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy on CHD as well as on risk markers of CHD, it has been suggested that CHD could be prevented in postmenopausal women with long-term hormone therapy. However, since the publications of the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study and the Women's Health Initiative trial, prescription of hormone therapy for the prevention of CHD has become controversial. Major efforts have been made to identify alternatives for hormone therapy. Compounds suggested have included selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), which represent a class with a growing number of compounds that act as either estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists in a tissue-specific manner. This pharmacological profile may offer the opportunity to dissociate favourable estrogenic effects on the bone and cardiovascular system from unfavourable stimulatory effects on the breast and endometrium. Two SERMs presently on the market are tamoxifen and raloxifene. The only data available regarding the effects of tamoxifen on cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women are from breast cancer trials. These trials found fewer fatal myocardial events in women randomly assigned to tamoxifen compared with women assigned to placebo. Raloxifene is a second-generation SERM that has been shown to prevent osteoporotic fractures, is safe for the endometrium and holds high promise for the prevention of breast cancer. The effect of raloxifene on CHD is still uncertain. On the basis of the MORE (Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation) trial, raloxifene may offer some protection to women with CHD or to those who are at high risk of CHD. Proof that raloxifene reduces the risk of CHD requires a clinical trial with hard clinical endpoints. Such a study is currently underway. Next-generation SERMs taken into clinical development include idoxifene, droloxifene, ospemifene, arzoxifene, acolbifene/EM-800, levormeloxifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene and HMR 3339. The aim is to find a compound with the ideal profile, that is, alleviation of climacteric symptoms and prevention of osteoporotic fractures, but without an adverse effect on the breast and endometrium, and no negative effect or even a beneficial effect on the cardiovascular system and the brain. Currently, limited data are available with regard to these next-generation SERMs and CHD. Nevertheless, some of these novel agents provide arguments for continuing the search for an ideal SERM.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseAnimalsEstrogen AntagonistsFemaleHumansPostmenopauseSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsEstrogen AntagonistsSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID16451093
OpenAlexW2043909215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.