Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16450078›Full record

Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2005

One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II-mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

S Bringman, S Wollert, J Osterberg, S Smedberg, H Granlund, G Felländer, T Heikkinen

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International guidelines for groin hernia management.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Lightweight versus heavyweight in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2009
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Which mesh for hernia repair?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2010
    Review
  18. Hunterian Lecture. Hernia surgery: from guidelines to clinical practice.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2009
    Article
  19. Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2009
    Article
  20. Mesh repair of common abdominal hernias: a review on experimental and clinical studies.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

S BringmanCenter for Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, 15286 Södertälje, Sweden. sven.bringman@cfss.ki.se
S Wollert
J Osterberg
S Smedberg
H Granlund
G Felländer
T Heikkinen
Uppsala University Hospital · SEHelsingborgs lasarett · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEMora lasarett · SEOulu University Hospital · FISödertälje Sjukhus · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standard polypropylene mesh used in Lichtenstein's operation induces a strong foreign tissue reaction with potential harmful effects. A mesh with less polypropylene could possibly be beneficial. Six hundred men with primary unilateral inguinal hernias were randomised to Lichtenstein's operation using a Prolene- or Vypro II-mesh in six centres. The patients were blinded to which mesh they received. A validated questionnaire assessing recurrence and pain along with SF-36 Health Survey was sent after 1 year to all patients and a selected group was clinically examined. Of the 591 operated patients, 526 (89.0%) returned the questionnaire. 188 patients had some complaints or sensations of which 111 patients were clinically examined. The mean follow-up time was 13.6 (SD. 4.0) months. The incidence of hernia recurrence (four vs. four patients) and neuralgia (three vs. four patients) did not differ between Prolene and Vypro II-groups, respectively. One Vypro II-patient was re-operated due to neuralgia. There was no difference in the SF-36 scores. The results of Lichtenstein's operation with either Prolene or Vypro II do not seem to differ significantly.

Indexed as

Polyglactin 910PolypropylenesSurgical MeshHernia, InguinalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainRecurrenceSingle-Blind MethodPolyglactin 910Polypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID16450078
OpenAlexW2041705797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.