Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16450014›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical biochemist. Reviews2005

Recent developments in the first detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Joseph B Lopez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical biochemist. Reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Contribution of gut bacteria to liver pathobiology.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph B LopezInstitute for Medical Research, Jalan Pahang, 50588 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. jbhlopez@tm.net.my
Institute for Medical Research · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks fifth in frequency of cancers worldwide. The main aetiological factor is hepatitis B virus (HBV) although the importance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is growing. The most important tumour marker for HCC is alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The common method of screening high risk patients by AFP and ultrasonography has been shown to result in earlier detection and consequently more easily treatable tumours and longer survival. Proposed screening interval varies from once every 3 months to annually to "as indicated' but, most commonly, is once every 6 months. AFP is a fairly specific but insensitive marker for HCC. Sensitivity of HCC detection by blood markers is improved by combining various other markers with AFP. Of the other markers, the newer high sensitivity des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin (DCP) has been found to be useful. In addition the AFP fractions L3, P4/5 and the +II band are highly specific for HCC. Among routinely assayed tumour markers in the laboratory, CA 125 is more sensitive for HCC than AFP but far less specific. Various other enzymes, isoenzymes, growth factors, adhesion molecules, other proteins such as interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), human cervical cancer oncogene protein (HCCR) and glypican-3 (GPC3), p15 and p16 hypermethylation and nitrite/nitrate ratio have been tested; some of these show promise but none is presently in routine use. The value of other newer markers such as the HBx protein that is produced by HBV, and what are thought to be specific proteins and signatures identified by proteomics remain to be determined.

Identifiers

PMID16450014
PMCPMC1240033
OpenAlexW23602240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.