Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16449391›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks.

John M Westfall, Rebecca F VanVorst, Deborah S Main, Carol Herbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effective recruitment strategies and community-based participatory research: community networks program centers' recruitment in cancer prevention studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stakeholder Engagement In a Comparative Effectiveness/Implementation Study to PreventProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Generating National Dental PBRN Research Ideas Through the ToP Consensus Method Workshop.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John M WestfallUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center, UCHSC at Fitzsimons, Aurora, Colo 80045-0508, USA. jack.westfall@uchsc.edu
Rebecca F VanVorst
Deborah S Main
Carol Herbert

Funding

PHS HHS 1-D12-HP-0054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe wanted to describe community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks in the United States.

methodsWe surveyed all identified practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in the United States to find out whether they had a mechanism for obtaining feedback or involvement from the community of patients served by PBRN physicians. We asked open-ended questions on how they involve community members and whether they had plans for future involvement of community members and/or patients.

resultsWe received 46 completed questionnaires (71% response rate). Twenty-four reported that they have some mechanism to involve community members and/or patients in their research. No PBRN reported full participatory methods; however, several PBRNs reported active involvement by community members to generate research ideas, review research protocols, interpret results, and disseminate findings.

conclusionWhile perhaps not meeting the classical definition of CBPR, some PBRNs are involving community members and patients in their research. There is a wide spectrum of involvement by community members in PBRN research. Many PBRNs reported plans to involve community members in their research. We believe that community involvement will enhance PBRN research.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationPrimary Health CareData CollectionFamily PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID16449391
PMCPMC1466996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.