Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16448572›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2006

Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature.

Bionka M A Huisstede, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Bart W Koes, Jan A N Verhaar

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02593721 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effect of Median Nerve Neural Mobilization Versus Ibuprofen Pharmacologic Treatment in Patients With Cervicobrachial Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2015 to 2015Enrolled50ConditionsCervicobrachial NeuralgiaArmsMedian Nerve Neural Mobilization, Ibuprofen
NCT02595294 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effect of Neural Mobilization in Cervicobrachial Pain Compared to a Controlled Group

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2015 to 2015Enrolled52ConditionsCervicobrachial NeuralgiaArmsCervical Lateral Glide neural mobilization
NCT02596815 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effect of Median Nerve Neural Mobilization in Cervicobrachial Pain Compared to a Controlled Group

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2015 to 2015Enrolled51ConditionsCervicobrachial NeuralgiaArmsMedian Nerve Neural Mobilization, Goniometer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The occurrence of musculoskeletal complaints among professional musicians: a systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. The Relationship of Poor Posture While Using Electronic Devices and Periscapular Shoulder Pain.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bionka M A HuisstedeDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.huisstede@erasmusmc.nl
Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Bart W Koes
Jan A N Verhaar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic appraisal of the worldwide incidence and prevalence rates of UEDs available in scientific literature was executed to gauge the range of these estimates in various countries and to determine whether the rates are increasing in time.

methodsStudies that recruited at least 500 people, collected data by using questionnaires, interviews and/or physical examinations, and reported incidence or prevalence rates of the whole upper-extremity including neck, were included.

resultsNo studies were found with regard to the incidence of UEDs and 13 studies that reported prevalence rates of UEDs were included. The point prevalence ranged from 1.6-53%; the 12-months prevalence ranged from 2.3-41%. One study reported on the lifetime prevalence (29%). We did not find evidence of a clear increasing or decreasing pattern over time. The case definitions for UEDs used in the studies, differed enormously. Therefore, it was not possible to pool the data.

conclusionThere are substantial differences in reported prevalence rates on UEDs. Main reason for this is the absence of a universally accepted way of labelling or defining UEDs. If we want to make progress in this field, the first requirement is to agree on unambiguous terminology and classification of EUDs.

Indexed as

ArmGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMusculoskeletal DiseasesPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID16448572
PMCPMC1434740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.