Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16447295›Full record

ReviewHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2006

The unfinished legacy of liver transplantation: emphasis on immunology.

Thomas E Starzl, Fadi G Lakkis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tolerance Induction in Liver.International journal of organ transplantation medicine · 2015
    Review
  5. Review
  6. A complement-IL-4 regulatory circuit controls liver regeneration.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2012
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Allospecific CD154+ T cells associate with rejection risk after pediatric liver transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas E StarzlTransplantation Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. mangantl@msx.upmc.edu
Fadi G Lakkis
GTx (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONR01DK029961 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STARZL, THOMAS E · 1986 to 2001
$876k
GENE MODIFIED CLONED PIGSR01DK064207 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DAI, YIFAN · 2003 to 2005
$836k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK029961NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064207NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK64207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transplantation radically changed the philosophy of hepatology practice, enriched multiple areas of basic science, and had pervasive ripple effects in law, public policy, ethics, and theology. Why organ engraftment was feasible remained enigmatic, however, until the discovery in 1992 of donor leukocyte microchimerism in long-surviving liver, and other kinds of organ recipients. Following this discovery, the leukocyte chimerism-associated mechanisms were elucidated that directly linked organ and bone marrow transplantation and eventually clarified the relationship of transplantation immunology to the immunology of infections, neoplasms, and autoimmune disorders. We describe here how the initially controversial paradigm shift mandated revisions of cherished dogmas. With the fresh insight, the reasons for numerous inexplicable phenomena of transplantation either became obvious or have become susceptible to discriminate experimental testing. The therapeutic implications of the "new immunology" in hepatology and in other medical disciplines, have only begun to be explored. Apart from immunology, physiologic investigations of liver transplantation have resulted in the discovery of growth factors (beginning with insulin) that are involved in the regulation of liver size, ultrastructure, function, and the capacity for regeneration. Such studies have partially explained functional and hormonal relationships of different abdominal organs, and ultimately they led to the cure or palliation by liver transplantation of more than 2 dozen hepatic-based inborn errors of metabolism. Liver transplantation should not be viewed as a purely technologic achievement, but rather as a searchlight whose beams have penetrated the murky mist of the past, and continue to potentially illuminate the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsGraft vs Host ReactionHepatitis C, ChronicHost vs Graft ReactionHumansImmune ToleranceImmunosuppressive AgentsLiver TransplantationTransplantation ChimeraTransplantation ImmunologyImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID16447295
PMCPMC3095842
OpenAlexW2141736482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.