ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2006
On bias and transparency in the development of influential recommendations.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Policies on doctors' declaration of interests in medical organisations: a thematic analysis.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2023Article
- Financial Conflicts of Interest in Propensity Score-Matched Studies Evaluating Biologics and Biosimilars for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021Review
- Potential Conflict of Interest and Bias in the RACGP's Smoking Cessation Guidelines: Are GPs Provided with the Best Advice on Smoking Cessation for their Patients?Public health ethics · 2015Article
- Transparency in reimbursement decisions: in whose best interest?PharmacoEconomics · 2014Article
- Moving from opacity to transparency in pharmaceutical policy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008Review
- Guideline standardisation, cost effectiveness, industry needs and conflict of interest.Mens sana monographs · 2007Article
- Evidence and advocacy: are all things considered?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.