Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16446441›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Imaging hair cell transduction at the speed of sound: dynamic behavior of mammalian stereocilia.

Anders Fridberger, Igor Tomo, Mats Ulfendahl, Jacques Boutet de Monvel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Extensive hearing loss induced by low-frequency noise exposure.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Control of hearing sensitivity by tectorial membrane calcium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Simulating the Chan-Hudspeth experiment on an active excised cochlear segment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  19. Minimal basilar membrane motion in low-frequency hearing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Effects of salicylate on sound-evoked outer hair cell stereocilia deflections.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders FridbergerCenter for Hearing and Communication Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, M1 Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. anders.fridberger@ki.se
Igor Tomo
Mats Ulfendahl
Jacques Boutet de Monvel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlea contains two types of sensory cells, the inner and outer hair cells. Sound-evoked deflection of outer hair cell stereocilia leads to fast force production that will enhance auditory sensitivity up to 1,000-fold. In contrast, inner hair cells are thought to have a purely receptive function. Deflection of their stereocilia produces receptor potentials, transmitter release, and action potentials in the auditory nerve. Here, we describe a method for rapid confocal imaging. The method was used to image stereocilia during simultaneous sound stimulation in an in vitro preparation of the guinea pig cochlea. We show that inner hair cell stereocilia move because they interact with the fluid surrounding the hair bundles, but stereocilia deflection occurs at a different phase of the stimulus than is generally expected. In outer hair cells, stereocilia deflections were approximately 1/3 of the reticular lamina displacement. Smaller deflections were found in inner hair cells. The ratio between stereocilia deflection and reticular lamina displacement is important for auditory function, because it determines the stimulus applied to transduction channels. The low ratio measured here suggests that amplification of hair-bundle movements may be necessary in vivo to preserve transduction fidelity at low stimulus levels. In the case of the inner hair cells, this finding would represent a departure from traditional views on their function.

Indexed as

SoundAnimalsCiliaGuinea PigsHair Cells, AuditoryMechanotransduction, CellularMicroscopy, ConfocalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16446441
PMCPMC1413628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.