Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16443615›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2006

A prospective questionnaire assessment of attitudes and experiences of off label prescribing among hospital based paediatricians.

J S McLay, M Tanaka, S Ekins-Daukes, P J Helms

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceptions and attitudes towards off-label dispensing for pediatric patients, a study of hospital based pharmacists in Jordan.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Drug formulations that require less than 0.1 mL of stock solution to prepare doses for infants and children.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J S McLayDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Buildings, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. j.mclay@abdn.ac.uk
M Tanaka
S Ekins-Daukes
P J Helms

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess current attitudes of hospital based paediatricians to off label prescribing, and the performance of clinical trials in children.

designA prospective, questionnaire based study.

setting257 hospital based consultants and specialist registrars in paediatric practice in Scotland during 2003-2004.

resultsA 25 item questionnaire was sent to 257 hospital based paediatricians and 151 (59%) were returned completed. Over 90% of responders were familiar with the concept of, and knowingly prescribed, off label drugs; 55% of responders stated that such prescribing disadvantaged children, and 47% expressed concerns about the efficacy of off label medicines. Although 70% of responders expressed concerns about safety, only 17% had observed an adverse event, and 47% a treatment failure, while 69% did not obtain informed consent or tell parents they were prescribing off label, and 67% did not inform the family's general practitioner. Many respondents did not believe it was necessary to carry out clinical trials in children for new (46%) or generic (64%) medicines. However, 52% of respondents stated that they would be willing to undertake clinical studies and recruit their own patients (61%) or children (73%) to take part in such studies.

conclusionsAmong Scottish paediatricians there is concern about off label prescribing, although the majority do not consider it necessary to inform parents or GP colleagues. The need for clinical trials in children was recognised but there was a less than wholehearted acceptance of the need for such studies, at variance with the current drive to promote clinical trials in this age group.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthPediatricsPharmaceutical PreparationsChildClinical Trials as TopicDrug LabelingHumansInformed ConsentInterprofessional RelationsMedical Staff, HospitalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesScotlandSurveys and QuestionnairesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID16443615
PMCPMC2082832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.