Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2006
A phase II study of VEPA/FEPP chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma in elderly patients: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9203.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics of patients with B-cell lymphoma enrolled in clinical trials for aggressive lymphoma in Japan: Japan Clinical Oncology Group - Lymphoma Study Group study - JCOG0108A.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2021Pooled it
- Targeting non-structural proteins of Hepatitis C virus for predicting repurposed drugs using QSAR and machine learning approaches.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Geriatric Research Policy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) policy.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Lymphoma Study Group (LSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial of LSG12 therapy for 45 elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma to clarify whether LSG12 reduces severe infection without lowering the complete response (CR) rate in comparison with LSG4. LSG12, which consisted of a regimen of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, doxorubicin, vindesine, etoposide, and procarbazine (VEPA/FEPP), excluded bleomycin and methotrexate of LSG4 therapy, reduced the dosages of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and increased etoposide and procarbazine dosages instead. Inclusion criteria consisted of a patient age of 70 to 75 years, a World Health Organization performance status of 0 to 2, and acceptable organ function. The treatment was completed in 47% of the patients and terminated early for disease progression in 20% and for toxicity in 16%. The CR rate was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-74%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 42% (95% CI, 27%-57%), and the median OS time was 4.3 years. Leukopenia of grade 3 to 4 occurred in 98% of the patients, and severe infection occurred in 9%. Eight patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody showed no severe hepatic toxicity and had a better CR or OS rate than the 37 HCV-negative patients. Although the outcomes of LSG12 met our expectations with a reduction in severe infection and equivalent CR and OS outcomes compared with LSG4 and CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), the possibility of a regimen more beneficial than LSG12 for aggressive lymphoma in the elderly patient should be explored because of frequent hematologic toxicity and poor compliance in LSG12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.