Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16443554›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2006

A phase II study of VEPA/FEPP chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma in elderly patients: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9203.

Fumi Mizoroki, Yuko Hirose, Masayuki Sano, Haruhiko Fukuda, Kensei Tobinai, Masanobu Nakata, Masafumi Taniwaki, Fumio Kawano, Kimiharu Uozumi, Kenichi Sawada and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Fumi MizorokiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Daisan Hospital, Jikei University School of Medicine, Komaeshi, Tokyo 201-8601, Japan. fumi@jikei.ac.jp
Yuko Hirose
Masayuki Sano
Haruhiko Fukuda
Kensei Tobinai
Masanobu Nakata
Masafumi Taniwaki
Fumio Kawano
Kimiharu Uozumi
Kenichi Sawada
Shiro Fukuhara
Kaori Nasu
Yoichiro Ohno
Hironobu Toki
Atsushi Togawa
Masahiro Kikuchi
Tomomitsu Hotta
Masanori Shimoyama
Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Lymphoma Study Group (JCOG-LSG)
Tokyo National Hospital · JPAkita University · JPFukuoka University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKagoshima University · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKansai Medical University · JPKumamoto Medical Center · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JPPrevention Group · USSaga University · JPSaitama International Medical Center · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPTenri Hospital · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Lymphoma Study Group (LSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial of LSG12 therapy for 45 elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma to clarify whether LSG12 reduces severe infection without lowering the complete response (CR) rate in comparison with LSG4. LSG12, which consisted of a regimen of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, doxorubicin, vindesine, etoposide, and procarbazine (VEPA/FEPP), excluded bleomycin and methotrexate of LSG4 therapy, reduced the dosages of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and increased etoposide and procarbazine dosages instead. Inclusion criteria consisted of a patient age of 70 to 75 years, a World Health Organization performance status of 0 to 2, and acceptable organ function. The treatment was completed in 47% of the patients and terminated early for disease progression in 20% and for toxicity in 16%. The CR rate was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-74%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 42% (95% CI, 27%-57%), and the median OS time was 4.3 years. Leukopenia of grade 3 to 4 occurred in 98% of the patients, and severe infection occurred in 9%. Eight patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody showed no severe hepatic toxicity and had a better CR or OS rate than the 37 HCV-negative patients. Although the outcomes of LSG12 met our expectations with a reduction in severe infection and equivalent CR and OS outcomes compared with LSG4 and CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), the possibility of a regimen more beneficial than LSG12 for aggressive lymphoma in the elderly patient should be explored because of frequent hematologic toxicity and poor compliance in LSG12.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinEtoposideFemaleHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMalePrednisoloneProcarbazineTreatment OutcomeVincristineVindesineAntineoplastic AgentsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinEtoposidePrednisoloneProcarbazineVincristineVindesine

Identifiers

PMID16443554
OpenAlexW2056708192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.