ArticleHeart and vessels2006
Effect of pressure overload and its recovery on the rat carotid artery: change of vascular reactivity and remodeling process.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Involvement of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Calcium Channel in Vascular Remodeling and Endothelial Dysfunction in Rats with Pressure Overload.Current medical science · 2020Article
- Favorable cardiac and aortic remodeling in olmesartan-treated spontaneously hypertensive rats.Heart and vessels · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared to chronic hypertension, little is known about the pathophysiology of acute hypertension and its recovery. To characterize this, we investigated the functional and structural properties of the common carotid arteries (CCA) from 35 rats. We established a unilateral and reversible carotid arterial hypertension model using the partial transverse aortic constriction (TAC) technique. By TAC, the right CCAs were made to endure a pressure-overload environment, while the left CCAs remained under normotension. The TACs were removed 2 weeks later, which unloaded the hypertensive effects. We compared the contractile, histological, and molecular responses of the CCA before TAC, during TAC (the hypertension period), and after removal of TAC (the recovery period). Vessel contractility was nearly abolished during 2 weeks of TAC. The recovery process from hypertension showed an initial hypercontractile period within a week. The relaxation response due to acetylcholine, as measured during the recovery period, showed a longer time course than the contractility for recovering its magnitude. During the hypertension period, the media thickness increased and this persisted throughout the recovery period. Apoptosis of the endothelial layer was significantly increased during the hypertension period and this disappeared 2 weeks after recovery. Expression of endothelial NO synthase was not detectable at the end of the hypertension period, but this gradually returned to the basal level after 2 weeks of recovery. Although increased contractility is usually expected in chronic hypertensive vessels, an abrupt pressure overload decreases contractility and the endothelium-dependent relaxation. It also increases endothelial apoptosis and the media thickness. These findings have clinical relevance, and they could be applied to human acute and severe hypertension and its recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.