ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Offering results to research participants.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Research Participants' Attitudes towards Receiving Information on Genetic Susceptibility to Arsenic Toxicity in Rural Bangladesh.Public health genomics · 2020Article
- Consent revisited: the impact of return of results on participants' views and expectations about trial participation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.Genome research · 2012Article
- Investing in the future: lessons learnt from communicating the results of HSV/ HIV intervention trials in South Africa.Health research policy and systems · 2011Article
- Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications.BMC medical research methodology · 2011Article
- Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.Public health genomics · 2011Article
- Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2010Article
- Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
- Communicating the results of research: how do participants of a cardiac rehabilitation RCT prefer to be informed?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
- Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2008Article
- Initial experience with a group presentation of study results to research participants.Trials · 2008Article
- Disclosure of genetics research results after the death of the patient participant: a qualitative study of the impact on relatives.Journal of genetic counseling · 2007Article
- Offering results to research participants.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.