Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16438810›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006

Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium.

Reginald Deschepper, Robert Vander Stichele, Jan L Bernheim, Els De Keyser, Greta Van Der Kelen, Freddy Mortier, Luc Deliens

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caring for older people: is home care always best?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GPs and involuntary admission: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  5. Article
  6. GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The continuing challenge of palliative care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reginald DeschepperEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Dept. of Medical Sociology and Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. reginald.deschepper@vub.ac.be
Robert Vander Stichele
Jan L Bernheim
Els De Keyser
Greta Van Der Kelen
Freddy Mortier
Luc Deliens
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication with patients on end-of-life decisions is a delicate topic for which there is little guidance.

aimTo describe the development of a guideline for GPs on end-of-life communication with patients who wish to die at home, in a context where patient autonomy and euthanasia are legally regulated. DESIGN OF STUDY: A three-phase process (generation, elaboration and validation). In the generation phase, literature findings were structured and then prioritised in a focus group with GPs of a palliative care consultation network. In the elaboration phase, qualitative data on patients' and caregivers' perspectives were gathered through a focus group with next-of-kin, in-depth interviews with terminal patients, and four quality circle sessions with representatives of all constituencies. In the validation phase, the acceptability of the draft guideline was reviewed in bipolar focus groups (GPs-nurses and GPs-specialists). Finally, comments were solicited from experts by mail.

settingPrimary home care in Belgium. SUBJECTS: Participants in this study were terminal patients (n = 17), next-of-kin of terminal patients (n = 17), GPs (n = 25), specialists (n = 3), nurses (n = 8), other caregivers (n = 2) and experts (n = 41).

resultsCaregivers and patients expressed a need for a comprehensive guideline on communication in end-of-life decisions. Four major communication themes were prioritised: truth telling; exploration of the patient's wishes regarding the end of life; dealing with disproportionate interventions; and dealing with requests for euthanasia in the terminal phase of life. Additional themes required special attention in the guideline: continuity of care by the GP; communication on foregoing food and fluid; and technical aspects of euthanasia.

conclusionIt was feasible to develop a guideline by combining the three cornerstones of evidence-based medicine: literature search, patient values and professional experience.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingAdvance DirectivesAttitude to HealthBelgiumCaregiversChoice BehaviorEuthanasiaFamily PracticeFocus GroupsHome Care ServicesHumansPatient Education as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicProfessional-Patient RelationsTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID16438810
PMCPMC1828069
OpenAlexW2122145005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.