ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006
Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caring for older people: is home care always best?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
- Older patients' attitudes towards and experiences of patient-physician end-of-life communication: a secondary analysis of interviews from British, Dutch and Belgian patients.BMC palliative care · 2012Article
- Article
- GPs and involuntary admission: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Article
- Physician reports of medication use with explicit intention of hastening the end of life in the absence of explicit patient request in general practice in Belgium.BMC public health · 2010Article
- GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009Article
- Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: a mortality follow-back study in Belgium.BMC public health · 2009Article
- The continuing challenge of palliative care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunication with patients on end-of-life decisions is a delicate topic for which there is little guidance.
aimTo describe the development of a guideline for GPs on end-of-life communication with patients who wish to die at home, in a context where patient autonomy and euthanasia are legally regulated. DESIGN OF STUDY: A three-phase process (generation, elaboration and validation). In the generation phase, literature findings were structured and then prioritised in a focus group with GPs of a palliative care consultation network. In the elaboration phase, qualitative data on patients' and caregivers' perspectives were gathered through a focus group with next-of-kin, in-depth interviews with terminal patients, and four quality circle sessions with representatives of all constituencies. In the validation phase, the acceptability of the draft guideline was reviewed in bipolar focus groups (GPs-nurses and GPs-specialists). Finally, comments were solicited from experts by mail.
settingPrimary home care in Belgium. SUBJECTS: Participants in this study were terminal patients (n = 17), next-of-kin of terminal patients (n = 17), GPs (n = 25), specialists (n = 3), nurses (n = 8), other caregivers (n = 2) and experts (n = 41).
resultsCaregivers and patients expressed a need for a comprehensive guideline on communication in end-of-life decisions. Four major communication themes were prioritised: truth telling; exploration of the patient's wishes regarding the end of life; dealing with disproportionate interventions; and dealing with requests for euthanasia in the terminal phase of life. Additional themes required special attention in the guideline: continuity of care by the GP; communication on foregoing food and fluid; and technical aspects of euthanasia.
conclusionIt was feasible to develop a guideline by combining the three cornerstones of evidence-based medicine: literature search, patient values and professional experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16438810PMC1828069W2122145005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.