ReviewAnnals of Saudi medicine
Update in hypertension: the Seventh Joint National Committee report and beyond.
Review in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of frailty syndrome with coexisting hypertension and depression among older individuals, aged >80 years of age.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2022Article
- SPAK-knockout mice manifest Gitelman syndrome and impaired vasoconstriction.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2010Article
- A Study of Correlation of Alopecia Areata and Metabolic Syndrome in Northwest Indian Population: A Case-Control Study.International journal of trichologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation on and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VII) had new key messages that need to be highlighted for practicing physicians. More than two years has elapsed since its publication and several important trials and meta-analyses were published during this period. Most of these publications supported and reinforced the JNC-VII recommendations, but others did not fully agree. Thus, some questions have arisen that need to be addressed in future research. This review will discuss what is new in JNC-VII and post-JNC-VII evidence that supports or disputes the recommendations. In addition, the results of other significant trials will be addressed. Finally, we outline the clinical "bottom line" and emphasize the practical application of this evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.