Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16437523›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Auricular acupuncture for cocaine dependence.

S Gates, L A Smith, D R Foxcroft

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The status and future of acupuncture clinical research.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2008
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The History, Mechanism, and Clinical Application of Auricular Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015
    Review
  16. Adverse events of auricular therapy: a systematic review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. How to design the control group in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture?Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2012
    Article
  19. Evidence from the Cochrane Collaboration for Traditional Chinese Medicine therapies.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2009
    Review
  20. Ear acupuncture in European traditional medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S GatesWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick Emergency Care and Rehabilitation, Coventry CV4 7AL, Coventry, UK, CV4 7AL. s.gates@warwick.ac.uk
L A Smith
D R Foxcroft
Oxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuricular acupuncture (insertion of acupuncture into a number, usually five, of specific points in the ear) is a widely-used treatment for cocaine dependence.

objectivesTo determine whether auricular acupuncture is an effective treatment for cocaine dependence, and to investigate whether its effectiveness is influenced by the treatment regimen. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004); MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2004) , EMBASE (January 1988 to October 2004); PsycInfo (1985 to October 2004); CINAHL (1982 to October 2004); SIGLE (1980 to October 2004) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing a therapeutic regimen of auricular acupuncture with sham acupuncture or no treatment for reduction of cocaine use in cocaine dependents. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data from published reports and assessed study quality using the Drug and Alcohol CRG checklist. All authors were contacted for additional information; two provided data. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for studies comparing auricular acupuncture with sham acupuncture, and with no treatment. For the main cocaine use outcomes, analyses were conducted by intention to treat, assuming that missing data were treatment failures. Available case analyses, using only individuals who provided data, were also conducted. MAIN

resultsSeven studies with a total of 1,433 participants were included. All were of generally low methodological quality. No differences between acupuncture and sham acupuncture were found for attition RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.23) or acupuncture and no acupuncture: RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.26) neither for any measure of cocaine or other drug use. However, the number of participants included in meta-analyses was low, and power was limited. Moderate benefit or harm is not ruled out by these results. Methodological limitations of the included studies may have also made the results open to bias. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is currently no evidence that auricular acupuncture is effective for the treatment of cocaine dependence. The evidence is not of high quality and is inconclusive. Further randomised trials of auricular acupuncture may be justified.

Indexed as

Acupuncture, EarCocaine-Related DisordersHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID16437523
PMCPMC12371391
OpenAlexW1753802956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.