SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness using routine surveillance data among children aged 6-59 months for five consecutive influenza seasons.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2015Pooled it
- Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Pooled it
- Article
- Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011-2012: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2011Article
- Immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine in extremely low-birth-weight, premature versus term infants.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2011Article
- Effects of vaccination against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among Japanese children.Emerging infectious diseases · 2011Article
- A universal influenza A vaccine based on adenovirus expressing matrix-2 ectodomain and nucleoprotein protects mice from lethal challenge.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2010Article
- Statement on Seasonal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (TIV) for 2010-2011: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2010Article
- Protective effect of single-dose adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine in children.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2010Article
- Lessons from the first year of the WAIVE study investigating the protective effect of influenza vaccine against laboratory-confirmed influenza in hospitalised children aged 6-59 months.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2010Article
- Optimal pandemic influenza vaccine allocation strategies for the Canadian population.PloS one · 2010Article
- A computer simulation of employee vaccination to mitigate an influenza epidemic.American journal of preventive medicine · 2010Article
- Optimal pandemic influenza vaccine allocation strategies for the canadian population.PLoS currents · 2010Article
- Blocking interhost transmission of influenza virus by vaccination in the guinea pig model.Journal of virology · 2009Article
- Pandemic influenza vaccines.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2009Review
- Cochrane Review: Interventions for the interruption or reduction of the spread of respiratory viruses.Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal · 2008Article
- Seasonal influenza in the United States, France, and Australia: transmission and prospects for control.Epidemiology and infection · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn children and adults the consequences of influenza are mainly absences from school and work, however the risk of complications is greatest in children and people over 65 years old.
objectivesTo appraise all comparative studies evaluating the effects of influenza vaccines in healthy children; assess vaccine efficacy (prevention of confirmed influenza) and effectiveness (prevention of influenza-like illness) and document adverse events associated with receiving influenza vaccines. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005); OLD MEDLINE (1966 to 1969); MEDLINE (1969 to December 2004); EMBASE (1974 to December 2004); Biological Abstracts (1969 to December 2004); and Science Citation Index (1974 to December 2004). We wrote to vaccine manufacturers and a number of corresponding authors of studies in the review. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and case-control studies of any influenza vaccine in healthy children under 16 years old. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsFifty-one studies involving 263,987 children were included. Seventeen papers were translated from Russian. Fourteen RCTs and 11 cohort studies were included in the analysis of vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. From RCTs, live vaccines showed an efficacy of 79% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48% to 92%) and an effectiveness of 33% (95% CI 28% to 38%) in children older than two years compared with placebo or no intervention. Inactivated vaccines had a lower efficacy of 59% (95% CI 41% to 71%) than live vaccines but similar effectiveness: 36% (95% CI 24% to 46%). In children under two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo. Thirty-four reports containing safety outcomes were included, 22 including live vaccines, 8 inactivated vaccines and 4 both types. The most commonly presented short-term outcomes were temperature and local reactions. The variability in design of studies and presentation of data was such that meta-analysis of safety outcome data was not feasible. AUTHORS'
conclusionsInfluenza vaccines are efficacious in children older than two years but little evidence is available for children under two. There was a marked difference between vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. That no safety comparisons could be carried out emphasizes the need for standardisation of methods and presentation of vaccine safety data in future studies. It was surprising to find only one study of inactivated vaccine in children under two years, given recent recommendations to vaccinate healthy children from six months old in the USA and Canada. If immunisation in children is to be recommended as public-health policy, large-scale studies assessing important outcomes and directly comparing vaccine types are urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.