Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16437483›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods for contraception.

V Halpern, D A Grimes, L Lopez, M F Gallo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prenatal care and subsequent birth intervals.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2012
    Article
  13. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sterilization in the United States.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2008
    Article
  20. Positive self-management program for women living with HIV: a descriptive analysis.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V HalpernFamily Health International, Clinical Research Department, 2224 E NC Highway 54, Durham, North Carolina 27713, USA. vhalpern@fhi.org
D A Grimes
L Lopez
M F Gallo
Family Health International 360 · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, hormonal contraceptives are among the most popular reversible contraceptives in current use. Despite their high theoretical effectiveness, typical use results in much lower effectiveness. In large part, this disparity reflects difficulties in adherence to the contraceptive regimen and low rates for long-term continuation.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of ancillary techniques to improve adherence to, and continuation rates of, hormonal methods of contraception. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched computerized databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing client-provider interventions with standard family planning counseling. Sources included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS, and PsycINFO. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of an intensive counseling technique or client-provider intervention versus routine family planning counseling. Interventions included group motivation; structured, peer, or multi-component counseling; and intensive reminders of appointments. Outcome measures were discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, number of missed pills and on-time injections, and pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary author evaluated all titles and abstracts from the searches to determine eligibility. Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. With RevMan 4.2, we calculated the odds ratio for all dichotomous outcomes and the weighted mean difference for continuous data. The studies were so different that we could not conduct a meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsWe found six RCTs; only one showed a statistically significant benefit of the experimental intervention. In that trial, women who received repeated, structured information about the injectable contraceptive depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) were less likely to have discontinued the method by 12 months (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.44) than were women who had routine counseling. The intervention group was also less likely to discontinue due to menstrual disturbances. In another study, the intervention group was less likely to discontinue due to dissatisfaction with the contraceptive method, but overall continuation was not affected. AUTHORS'

conclusionsMost studies to date have shown no benefit of strategies to improve adherence and continuation. These trials have important limitations, however. Two had small sample sizes, several had high losses to follow-up, and the intervention and its intensity varied across the studies. High-quality research is a priority, since adherence and continuation are fundamentally important to the successful use of hormonal contraceptives.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceTreatment RefusalContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, Oral, HormonalCounselingFemaleHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptives, Oral, HormonalMedroxyprogesterone Acetate

Identifiers

PMID16437483
OpenAlexW4232309477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.