SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Pooled it
- Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Immediate antiepileptic drug treatment, versus placebo, deferred, or no treatment for first unprovoked seizure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Pharmacotherapy of focal epilepsy in children: a systematic review of approved agents.CNS drugs · 2013Pooled it
- Identifying the incidence of rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in patients taking lamotrigine: a systematic review of 122 randomized controlled trials.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaPooled it
- The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2007Trial
- Review
- Long-term Effectiveness of Antiepileptic Drug Monotherapy in Partial Epileptic Patients: A 7-year Study in an Epilepsy Center in China.Chinese medical journal · 2015Article
- Antiepileptic Drug Treatment in Children with Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Antiepileptic drug treatment of rolandic epilepsy and Panayiotopoulos syndrome: clinical practice survey and clinical trial feasibility.Archives of disease in childhood · 2015Review
- CNS adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs.CNS drugs · 2008Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe choice of an antiepileptic drug (AED) for any individual should take into account reliable information about seizure control, adverse effects and cost. Carbamazepine is the usual drug of choice for people with newly-diagnosed partial onset seizures. Lamotrigine is a relatively new AED which is licensed in many countries for use as an initial monotherapy.
objectivesTo review the best evidence comparing carbamazepine and lamotrigine when used as monotherapy in people with partial onset seizures, or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures with or without other generalized seizure types. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (July 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (TheCochraneLibrary Issue 2, 2005), and MEDLINE (1966 to August 2005). No language restrictions were imposed. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and trial investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials, blinded or unblinded, in which children or adults with partial onset seizures or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to monotherapy with either carbamazepine or lamotrigine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This was an individual patient data review. Outcomes were (1) time to treatment withdrawal, (2) time to first seizure post randomization, and (3) seizure freedom at six months. Time to event data were analysed using a stratified logrank analysis with results expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); binary data were expressed as relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A HR or a RR greater than 1 indicated an event was more likely on lamotrigine than carbamazepine. MAIN
resultsIndividual patient data were available for 1384 participants (100% of total randomized) from the five trials that met our inclusion criteria. The main results (HR (95% CI)) were (1) time to treatment withdrawal 0.55 (0.35 to 0.84) (random-effects), (2) time to first seizure post randomization 1.14 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.43), and (3) seizure freedom at six months RR 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.04). The review suggested that time to treatment withdrawal was significantly improved with lamotrigine compared to carbamazepine, while time to first seizure and seizure freedom at six months favoured carbamazepine although the results were not statistically significant. AUTHORS'
conclusionsLamotrigine was significantly less likely to be withdrawn than carbamazepine but results for time to first seizure suggested that carbamazepine may be superior in terms of seizure control. Trials were of too short a duration to measure important seizure outcomes such as time to 12 month remission. Further trials are needed in which longer-term outcome is assessed as well as measures such as psychosocial outcome and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.