Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16437299›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2006

A multiplex PCR to identify porcine mycoplasmas present in broth cultures.

T Stakenborg, J Vicca, P Butaye, H Imberechts, J Peeters, A de Kruif, F Haesebrouck, D Maes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic profile of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae isolates from Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two clinical isolates ofJournal of veterinary science · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T StakenborgVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Groeselenberg 99, 1180, Brussels. tista@var.fgov.be
J Vicca
P Butaye
H Imberechts
J Peeters
A de Kruif
F Haesebrouck
D Maes
Ghent University · BEVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyorhinis and Mycoplasma flocculare can be present in the lungs of pigs at the same time. These three mycoplasma species all require similar growth conditions and can be recovered from clinical samples using the same media. We have developed a multiplex PCR as a helpful tool for rapid differentiation of these three species in the course of isolation. Based on the 16S ribosomal DNA sequences, three different forward primers and a single reverse primer were selected. Each forward primer was compared to available mycoplasma sequences, showing the primers to be specific. The three amplification products observed of 1129 bp (M. hyorhinis), 1000 bp (M. hyopneumoniae) and 754 bp (M. flocculare) were clearly distinguishable on a 1% agarose gel. In addition, no cross-reaction with Mycoplasma hyosynoviae, another porcine mycoplasma, was noted. This multiplex PCR using the proposed set of primers is the first reported assay that allows the simultaneous identification of the different Mycoplasma species isolated from the lungs of pigs.

Indexed as

AnimalsLung DiseasesMycoplasmaMycoplasma InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySwineSwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID16437299
OpenAlexW1968634563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.