ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie1992
Comparison of the vasodilator effects of thiopentone and pentobarbitone.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to elucidate the vasodilator mechanisms of barbiturates. In helical strips of dog mesenteric artery, the effects of pretreatment with thiopentone and pentobarbitone on the contractions induced by KCl (2.0 x 10(-2) M) and norepinephrine (10(-5) M) in normal bathing fluid, and those induced by norepinephrine and caffeine (2.5 x 10(-2) M) in Ca(++)-free fluid were tested, and their effects on caffeine-induced contractions in skinned strips were also examined. Thiopentone, at concentrations over 10(-4) M, inhibited the KCl-induced contractions in normal bathing fluid and those induced by caffeine in Ca(++)-free fluid and, at concentrations over 3 x 10(-4) M, inhibited norepinephrine-induced contractions in normal and Ca(++)-free bathing fluids significantly. Pentobarbitone, at concentrations over 3 x 10(-4) M, inhibited KCl- and norepinephrine-induced contractions in normal bathing fluid significantly, whereas contractions in Ca(++)-free fluid induced by norepinephrine and caffeine were inhibited only by a high concentration (10(-3) M) of pentobarbitone. Caffeine-induced contractions of chemically skinned fibres were more susceptible to inhibition by thiopentone than by pentobarbitone. These results suggest that the vasodilator effect of thiopentone is mediated via its intracellular inhibitory effect and that, in contrast, the vasodilator effect of pentobarbitone can be attributed mainly to its Ca(++)-channel blocking action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.