Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16436730›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006

Clinical evaluation of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Satowa Suzuki, Tsutomu Yamazaki, Mitsuo Narita, Norio Okazaki, Isao Suzuki, Tomoaki Andoh, Mayumi Matsuoka, Tsuyoshi Kenri, Yoshichika Arakawa, Tsuguo Sasaki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Serum Interferon-γ Is Associated With RefractoryJournal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Article
  4. Efficacy of garenoxacin in patients with macrolide-resistantAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AgeFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Doxycycline treatment for drug-resistantFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. World journal of clinical cases · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Characteristics of theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. RefractoryJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Satowa SuzukiDepartment of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsutomu Yamazaki
Mitsuo Narita
Norio Okazaki
Isao Suzuki
Tomoaki Andoh
Mayumi Matsuoka
Tsuyoshi Kenri
Yoshichika Arakawa
Tsuguo Sasaki
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPChigasaki Rehabilitation College · JPKanagawa Prefectural Institute of Public Health · JPSaitama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MR M. pneumoniae) has been isolated from clinical specimens in Japan since 2000. A comparative study was carried out to determine whether or not macrolides are effective in treating patients infected with MR M. pneumoniae. The clinical courses of 11 patients with MR M. pneumoniae infection (MR patients) treated with macrolides were compared with those of 26 patients with macrolide-susceptible M. pneumoniae infection (MS patients). The total febrile days and the number of febrile days during macrolide administration were longer in the MR patients than in the MS patients (median of 8 days versus median of 5 days [P = 0.019] and 3 days versus 1 day [P = 0.002], respectively). In addition, the MR patients were more likely than the MS patients to have had a change of the initially prescribed macrolide to another antimicrobial agent (63.6% versus 3.8%; odds ratio, 43.8; P < 0.001), which might reflect the pediatrician's judgment that the initially prescribed macrolide was not sufficiently effective in these patients. Despite the fact that the febrile period was prolonged in MR patients given macrolides, the fever resolved even when the initial prescription was not changed. These results show that macrolides are certainly less effective in MR patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMacrolidesMaleMycoplasma pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID16436730
PMCPMC1366908
OpenAlexW2151068877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.