Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16436728›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006

Discordances between interpretation algorithms for genotypic resistance to protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus are subtype dependent.

Joke Snoeck, Rami Kantor, Robert W Shafer, Kristel Van Laethem, Koen Deforche, Ana Patricia Carvalho, Brian Wynhoven, Marcelo A Soares, Patricia Cane, John Clarke and 24 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 16 institutions in 12 countries.

Joke SnoeckRega Institute for Medical Research, Minderbroedersstraat 10, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Rami Kantor
Robert W Shafer
Kristel Van Laethem
Koen Deforche
Ana Patricia Carvalho
Brian Wynhoven
Marcelo A Soares
Patricia Cane
John Clarke
Candice Pillay
Sunee Sirivichayakul
Koya Ariyoshi
Africa Holguin
Hagit Rudich
Rosangela Rodrigues
Maria Belen Bouzas
Françoise Brun-Vézinet
Caroline Reid
Pedro Cahn
Luis Fernando Brigido
Zehava Grossman
Vincent Soriano
Wataru Sugiura
Praphan Phanuphak
Lynn Morris
Jonathan Weber
Deenan Pillay
Amilcar Tanuri
Richard P Harrigan
Ricardo Camacho
Jonathan M Schapiro
David Katzenstein
Anne-Mieke Vandamme
Rega Institute for Medical Research · BEStanford University · USAIDS Vancouver · CAChulalongkorn University · THFundación Huésped · ARHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital de Egas Moniz · PTInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BRIsrael Ministry of Health · ILNational Institute for Communicable DiseasesNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRBayer (Canada) · CAHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FRSalisbury District Hospital · GBSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major limitation of drug resistance genotyping for human immunodeficiency virus remains the interpretation of the results. We evaluated the concordance in predicting therapy response between four different interpretation algorithms (Rega 6.3, HIVDB-08/04, ANRS [07/04], and VGI 8.0). Sequences were gathered through a worldwide effort to establish a database of non-B subtype sequences, and demographic and clinical information about the patients was gathered. The most concordant results were found for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (93%), followed by protease inhibitors (84%) and nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTIs) (76%). For therapy-naive patients, for nelfinavir, especially for subtypes C and G, the discordances were driven mainly by the protease (PRO) mutational pattern 82I/V + 63P + 36I/V for subtype C and 82I + 63P + 36I + 20I for subtype G. Subtype F displayed more discordances for ritonavir in untreated patients due to the combined presence of PRO 20R and 10I/V. In therapy-experienced patients, subtype G displayed a lot of discordances for saquinavir and indinavir due to mutational patterns involving PRO 90 M and 82I. Subtype F had more discordance for nelfinavir attributable to the presence of PRO 88S and 82A + 54V. For the NRTIs lamivudine and emtricitabine, CRF01_AE had more discordances than subtype B due to the presence of RT mutational patterns 65R + 115 M and 118I + 215Y, respectively. Overall, the different algorithms agreed well on the level of resistance scored, but some of the discordances could be attributed to specific (subtype-dependent) combinations of mutations. It is not yet known whether therapy response is subtype dependent, but the advice given to clinicians based on a genotypic interpretation algorithm differs according to the subtype.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug Resistance, ViralGenotypeHIVHIV Protease InhibitorsMutationReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsHIV Protease InhibitorsReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16436728
PMCPMC1366873
OpenAlexW2155395980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.