Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16436641›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2006

Specific detection of cytokeratin 20-positive cells in blood of colorectal and breast cancer patients by a high sensitivity real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction method.

Giuliana Giribaldi, Simone Procida, Daniela Ulliers, Franca Mannu, Roberta Volpatto, Giorgia Mandili, Laura Fanchini, Oscar Bertetto, Gianruggero Fronda, Luigi Simula and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Serum tests for colorectal cancer screening.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giuliana GiribaldiUniversità di Torino, Dipartimento di Genetica, Biologia e Biochimica, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Torino, Italy. giuliana.giribaldi@unito.it
Simone Procida
Daniela Ulliers
Franca Mannu
Roberta Volpatto
Giorgia Mandili
Laura Fanchini
Oscar Bertetto
Gianruggero Fronda
Luigi Simula
Elena Rimini
Giovanni Cherchi
Lisa Bonello
Milena Maria Maule
Francesco Turrini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method for detection of cytokeratin 20-positive cells in blood characterized by two novel features was developed and tested on 99 patients with colorectal cancer, 110 with breast cancer, and 150 healthy subjects. To optimize the specificity and sensitivity of the method, two novel features were used. First, a primer overlapping two adjacent exons was generated to inhibit nonspecific amplification both in healthy donors and cancer patients; second, a non-end-point first-round amplification was used to increase sensitivity. The number of first-round cycles was chosen to reach the highest level of sensitivity while conserving quantitative characteristics. PCR efficiency increased from 88.9% in single-round RT-PCR to 99.0% in nested real-time RT-PCR. To establish sensitivity and specificity of the method, HT29 cells were serially diluted with normal blood. Detection limit improved from 100 HT29 cells (single-round RT-PCR) to 1 to 10 cells (nested real-time RT-PCR) per 3 ml of whole blood. None of the healthy subjects was positive, whereas 22 and 29% of all colorectal and breast cancer patients, respectively, had cytokeratin 20 cell equivalents in blood. The association between cytokeratin 20 cell equivalents and metastasis was statistically significant for breast (P = 0.026) but not colorectal cancer patients (P = 0.361). Negativity of all 150 healthy controls examined confers diagnostic potential to the method.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaColorectal NeoplasmsHumansKeratin-20KeratinsPolymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, NeoplasmSensitivity and SpecificityTumor Cells, CulturedBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-20KeratinsKRT20 protein, humanRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID16436641
PMCPMC1867572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.