ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2005
External quality assurance programme for enzymatic analysis of lysosomal storage diseases: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inborn errors of metabolism are rare and laboratories performing diagnostic tests in this field must participate in external quality assurance (EQA) schemes to demonstrate their competence and also to maintain sufficient experience with patient material. EQA schemes for metabolite analyses are available (ERNDIM), but corresponding EQA schemes for enzyme analyses are nonexistent. In this paper we describe a pilot study on lysosomal enzyme testing by four centres in The Netherlands. Quantitative aspects of EQA were studied by interlaboratory comparison of activities of six lysosomal enzymes in a series of buffy coat samples. Interlaboratory variance was enormous. To reduce variance caused by methodological differences, participants reported enzyme activities relative to mean normal values. Beta-D-Galactosidase activities compared well between the participating laboratories (average interlaboratory CV 13%), but for other enzymes large differences were observed, e.g. sphingomyelinase (average CV 38%). Diagnostic proficiency was tested with cultured fibroblasts. In 45 out of a total of 48 tests (12 cell lines, 4 participants) the correct diagnosis was accomplished on the basis of merely biochemical investigations, i.e. without clinical data of the patients. In a survey using blood of a late-onset Pompe disease patient, less conclusive results were obtained. A stable enzyme source was developed for easy distribution. Most lysosomal enzymes were stable upon lyophilization of leukocyte homogenates and during subsequent storage of the freeze-dried material at room temperature, in particular when cryolyoprotectant was added. Shipment of such lyophilized samples is simple and cheap and ideal for an EQA scheme. Our study shows that an EQA programme for enzymatic testing of lysosomal storage diseases is necessary to accomplish reliable diagnostic procedures for lysosomal storage diseases. We recommend that EQA for lysosomal enzymes be implemented through ERNDIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16435191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.