Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16434974›Full record

ArticleOncogene2006

The UVB-induced gene expression profile of human epidermis in vivo is different from that of cultured keratinocytes.

C D Enk, J Jacob-Hirsch, H Gal, I Verbovetski, N Amariglio, D Mevorach, A Ingber, D Givol, G Rechavi, M Hochberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidative and Skin Protective Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  6. UVB Irradiation Induced Cell Damage and Early Onset ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. AnFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of narrow band UVB (311 nm) irradiation on epidermal cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C D EnkDepartment of Dermatology, The Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. enk@md.huji.ac.il
J Jacob-Hirsch
H Gal
I Verbovetski
N Amariglio
D Mevorach
A Ingber
D Givol
G Rechavi
M Hochberg
Hadassah Medical Center · ILWeizmann Institute of Science · ILCancer Research Center · USSheba Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to obtain a comprehensive picture of the molecular events regulating cutaneous photodamage of intact human epidermis, suction blister roofs obtained after a single dose of in vivo ultraviolet (UV)B exposure were used for microarray profiling. We found a changed expression of 619 genes. Half of the UVB-regulated genes had returned to pre-exposure baseline levels at 72 h, underscoring the transient character of the molecular cutaneous UVB response. Of special interest was our finding that several of the central p53 target genes remained unaffected following UVB exposure in spite of p53 protein accumulation. We next compared the in vivo expression profiles of epidermal sheets to that of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes exposed to UVB in vitro. We found 1931 genes that differed in their expression profiles between the two groups. The expression profile in intact epidemis was geared mainly towards DNA repair, whereas cultured keratinocytes responded predominantly by activating genes associated with cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. These differences in expression profiles might reflect differences between mature differentiating keratinocytes in the suprabasal epidermal layers versus exponentially proliferating keratinocytes in cell culture. Our findings show that extreme care should be taken when extrapolating from findings based on keratinocyte cultures to changes in intact epidermis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingUltraviolet RaysAdultApoptosisBiomarkersCells, CulturedDNA RepairEpidermisGene Expression RegulationHumansKeratinocytesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID16434974
OpenAlexW2074270952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.