Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16433932›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology2006

Pharmacological profiles of opioid ligands at kappa opioid receptors.

Parham Gharagozlou, Ezzat Hashemi, Timothy M DeLorey, J David Clark, Jelveh Lameh

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Kappa opioid receptor control of motivated behavior revisited.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Roles of peripheral and central µAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Genetics-Based Targeting Strategies for Precise Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "I'll Be Back": The Resurrection of Dezocine.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Parham GharagozlouDepartment of Pharmacology, Molecular Research Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. parhamgr@hotmail.com
Ezzat Hashemi
Timothy M DeLorey
J David Clark
Jelveh Lameh
Molecular Research Institute · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

PHARMACOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF OPIATE NARCOTICSR01DA012539 · NIDA · MOLECULAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LAMEH, JELVEH · 1999 to 2003
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS DA12539NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to describe the activity of a set of opioid drugs, including partial agonists, in a human embryonic kidney cell system stably expressing only the mouse kappa-opioid receptors. Receptor activation was assessed by measuring the inhibition of cyclic adenosine mono phosphate (cAMP) production stimulated by 5 microM forskolin. Intrinsic activities and potencies of these ligands were determined relative to the endogenous ligand dynorphin and the kappa agonist with the highest intrinsic activity that was identified in this study, fentanyl.

resultsAmong the ligands studied naltrexone, WIN 44,441 and dezocine, were classified as antagonists, while the remaining ligands were agonists. Intrinsic activity of agonists was assessed by determining the extent of inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production. The absolute levels of inhibition of cAMP production by each ligand was used to describe the rank order of intrinsic activity of the agonists; fentanyl = lofentanil > or = hydromorphone = morphine = nalorphine > or = etorphine > or = xorphanol > or = metazocine > or = SKF 10047 = cyclazocine > or = butorphanol > nalbuphine. The rank order of affinity of these ligands was; cyclazocine > naltrexone > or = SKF 10047 > or = xorphanol > or = WIN 44,441 > nalorphine > butorphanol > nalbuphine > or = lofentanil > dezocine > or = metazocine > or = morphine > hydromorphone > fentanyl.

conclusionThese results elucidate the relative activities of a set of opioid ligands at kappa-opioid receptor and can serve as the initial step in a systematic study leading to understanding of the mode of action of these opioid ligands at this receptor.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLigandsMiceNarcotic AntagonistsProtein BindingReceptors, Opioid, kappaAnalgesics, OpioidLigandsNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, kappa

Identifiers

PMID16433932
PMCPMC1403760
OpenAlexW1532642006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.