Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16433867›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2006

Comparative effects of ivabradine, a selective heart rate-lowering agent, and propranolol on systemic and cardiac haemodynamics at rest and during exercise.

Robinson Joannides, Nicholas Moore, Michaela Iacob, Patricia Compagnon, Guy Lerebours, Jean-François Menard, Christian Thuillez

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02584439 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Pharmacological Heart Rate Reduction on Visco-elastic Properties of the Arterial Wall (BRADYVASC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, RouenRan2015 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsHealthy, Vascular Stiffness, AgingArmsivabradine, lactose capsule (placebo)
NCT05348057 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Study of CMR to Evaluate the Effect of Ivabradine on the Improvement of Left Ventricular Remodeling in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI

TypeinterventionalSponsorQian gengRan2021 to 2022Enrolled240ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsIvabradine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Pharmacodynamic effects of ivabradine, a negative chronotropic agent, in healthy cats.Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology · 2011
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Comparison between the ECG Outcomes of Metoprolol and Bisoprolol.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Is Heart Rate a Norepiphenomenon in Heart Failure?Current cardiology reports · 2016
    Review
  19. HCN Channels Modulators: The Need for Selectivity.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robinson JoannidesDepartment of Pharmacology, Rouen University Hospital, INSERM U644, Rouen, France.
Nicholas Moore
Michaela Iacob
Patricia Compagnon
Guy Lerebours
Jean-François Menard
Christian Thuillez
Inserm · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRServier (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare in humans the effects of ivabradine and propranolol on cardiac and systemic haemodynamics at rest, during tilt and exercise.

methodsNine healthy volunteers randomly received single oral doses of ivabradine (Iva, 30 mg), propranolol (Propra, 40 mg) or placebo (Plac) during a double-blind cross-over study. Doses were selected to be equipotent in heart rate (HR) reduction. HR, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), cardiac index (CI, bioimpedance), rate pressure product (RPP), plasma epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE), were measured at rest at baseline, before and after two tilt and exercise tests, started 2 and 5 h after drug intake. Heart rate variability (low to high frequency ratio LF/HF) was evaluated at rest and at 5 th minute of tilt.

resultsAt rest, HR and RPP decreased similarly with Iva and Propra (both P < 0.01). During tilt, HR increased less with Iva than Propra (P < 0.01), LF/HF decreased after Iva (P < 0.03), SBP and mean blood pressure decreased after Propra (both P < 0.01), RPP decreased similarly after Iva and Propra (both P < 0.01) and CI decreased to a greater extent with Propra than with Iva or Plac (both P < 0.04). During exercise, Iva and Propra similarly decreased HR (both P < 0.01) and RPP (P < 0.01).

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that for a similar decrease in HR at rest and during sympathetic stimulation, acute administration of ivabradine, a selective heart rate-lowering agent, decreased myocardial oxygen demand to the same extent as a reference beta-blocker, propranolol, but without evidence of depressant effect on cardiac function.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultBenzazepinesCardiovascular AgentsCross-Over StudiesDepression, ChemicalDouble-Blind MethodEpinephrineExerciseHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansIvabradineMaleNorepinephrineAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBenzazepinesCardiovascular AgentsEpinephrineIvabradineNorepinephrinePropranolol

Identifiers

PMID16433867
PMCPMC1884997
OpenAlexW2049870131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.