Map positions of four dinucleotide repeats in the mouse t complex.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The use of unilateral PCR to identify prominent heteroduplexes formed during PCR of the mouse microsatellite locus D17Mit23.Molecular biotechnology · 2006
   Article
2. Mouse H2 congenic intervals: analysis and use for mapping.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1995
   Article
3. Mapping of 12 markers in the proximal region of mouse chromosome 17 using recombinant t haplotypes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1995
   Article
4. Mouse chromosome 17.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1992
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as