Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16432504›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2006

Compared pharmacology of human histamine H3 and H4 receptors: structure-activity relationships of histamine derivatives.

Florence Gbahou, Ludwig Vincent, Marie Humbert-Claude, Joel Tardivel-Lacombe, Claude Chabret, Jean-Michel Arrang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Histaminergic Control of Corticostriatal Synaptic Plasticity during Early Postnatal Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Antinociceptive effects of novel histamine HBritish journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florence GbahouINSERM, Unité de Neurobiologie et Pharmacologie Moléculaire (U573), Centre Paul Broca, 2 ter rue d'Alésia, 75014 Paris, France.
Ludwig Vincent
Marie Humbert-Claude
Joel Tardivel-Lacombe
Claude Chabret
Jean-Michel Arrang
Centre Paul Broca · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various histamine derivatives were investigated at the human H3 receptor (H3R) and H4 receptor (H4R) stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells using [125I]iodoproxyfan and [3H]histamine binding, respectively. In Tris buffer, [3H]histamine binding to membranes of HEK(hH4R) cells was monophasic (K(D) of 3.8+/-0.8 nM). In phosphate buffer, the Hill coefficient was decreased (n(H) = 0.5+/-0.1) and a large fraction of the binding was converted into a low-affinity component (K(D) = 67+/-27 nM). The inhibition of [3H]histamine binding by two agonists, a protean agonist and five antagonists/inverse agonists confirms that the potency of many H3R ligands is retained or only slightly reduced at the H4R. Histamine derivatives substituted with methyl groups in alpha, beta or N(alpha) position of the side chain retained a nanomolar potency at the H3R, but their affinity was dramatically decreased at the H4R. With relative potencies to histamine of 282 and 0.13% at the H3R and H4R, respectively, (+/-)-alpha,beta-dimethylhistamine is a potent and selective H3R agonist. Chiral alpha-branched analogues exhibited a marked stereoselectivity at the H3R and H4R, the enantiomers with a configuration equivalent to L-histidine being preferred at both receptors. The methylsubstitution of the imidazole ring was also studied. The relative potency to histamine of 4-methylhistamine (4-MeHA) at the H4R (67%) was similar to that reported at H2 receptors but, owing to its high affinity at the H4R (Ki = 7.0+/-1.2 nM) and very low potency at H1- and H3-receptors, it can be considered as a potent and selective H4R agonist. On inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP formation, all the compounds tested, including 4-MeHA, behaved as full agonists at both receptors. However, the maximal inhibition achieved at the H4R (approximately -30%) was much lower than at the H3R (approximately -80%). Thioperamide behaved as an inverse agonist at both receptors and increased cAMP formation with the same maximal effect (approximately +25%). In conclusion, although the pharmacological profiles of the human H3R and H4R overlap, the structure-activity relationships of histamine derivatives at both receptors strongly differ and lead to the identification of selective compounds.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveColforsinCyclic AMPDNA, ComplementaryHistamineHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansImidazolesIn Vitro TechniquesKidneyReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, HistamineReceptors, Histamine H3Receptors, Histamine H4Recombinant ProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipColforsinCyclic AMPDNA, ComplementaryHistamineHistamine H2 AntagonistsHRH4 protein, humanImidazolesiodoproxyfanReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, HistamineReceptors, Histamine H3Receptors, Histamine H4Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16432504
PMCPMC1751501
OpenAlexW2038377812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.