Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16428355›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2006

Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial.

E M Boyle, Y Freer, Z Khan-Orakzai, M Watkinson, E Wright, J R Ainsworth, N McIntosh

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2009
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Effect of topical anesthesia and age on pain scores during retinopathy of prematurity screening.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E M BoyleUniversity Medical Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Room 4G40, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4J9, Canada. emboyle@doctors.org.uk
Y Freer
Z Khan-Orakzai
M Watkinson
E Wright
J R Ainsworth
N McIntosh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening is necessary for infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity. Despite local anaesthetic drops, infants find eye examinations distressing, displaying behavioural and physiological changes indicating acute pain. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking reduce pain responses associated with invasive procedures.

objectiveTo evaluate the use of oral sucrose and/or pacifier for reducing pain responses during eye examinations.

methodsForty infants <32 weeks gestation or <1500 g birth weight, in two neonatal units, were randomised to one of four interventions administered two minutes before their first screening examination: 1 ml sterile water as placebo (group 1, n = 10), 1 ml 33% sucrose solution (group 2, n = 10), 1 ml sterile water with pacifier (group 3, n = 9), or 1 ml 33% sucrose solution with pacifier (group 4, n = 11). Examinations were videotaped. Two observers, blind to the intervention, assessed recordings. Pain responses were scored using the premature infant pain profile (PIPP).

resultsThe groups were similar in gestation, birth weight, and age at examination. Mean PIPP scores were 15.3, 14.3, 12.3, and 12.1 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Analysis of variance showed a significant difference in PIPP score between groups (p = 0.023). Infants randomised to pacifiers scored lower than those without pacifiers (p = 0.003). There was no difference between groups receiving sucrose and those receiving water (p = 0.321).

conclusionsNon-nutritive sucking reduced distress responses in infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. The difference in response was large enough to be detected by a validated assessment tool. No synergistic effect of sucrose and pacifier was apparent in this group.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnalgesiaAnalgesicsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPacifiersPainPhysical ExaminationRetinopathy of PrematuritySucking BehaviorSucroseTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID16428355
PMCPMC2672697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.