ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Using personal health information in medical research.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of 'opt in' versus 'opt out' approaches.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Trial
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble.Journal of medical ethics · 2015Article
- Challenges in evaluating Welfare to Work policy interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent.Implementation science : IS · 2008Article
- Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.Journal of medical ethics · 2008Article
- National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Personal privacy and public health: potential impacts of privacy legislation on health research in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.