Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16424418›Full record

ArticleChest2006

Colonization of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus among health-care workers screened by nasopharyngeal swab.

Hsin-Tsung Ho, Mau-Sun Chang, Tsai-Yin Wei, Wen-Shyang Hsieh, Chia-Chien Hung, Huei-Mei Yang, Yen-Ta Lu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. An observational, laboratory-based study of outbreaks of middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Jeddah and Riyadh, kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2014.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Observational
  7. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Antibiotiques (Paris, France : 1999) · 2007
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hsin-Tsung HoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Chest Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92, Sec 2, Chung-Shan North Rd, Taipei, 10449, Taiwan.
Mau-Sun Chang
Tsai-Yin Wei
Wen-Shyang Hsieh
Chia-Chien Hung
Huei-Mei Yang
Yen-Ta Lu
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TWMackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo report the efficacy and findings of a large-scale preventive screening program for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) using amplification of the virus from a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) obtained from the health-care workers (HCWs).

designA prospective observational study.

settingA medical center in Taiwan.

participantsTwo hundred thirty HCWs.

interventionNPS examination for the presence of SARS-CoV by two nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsDuring the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), NPS polymerase chain reaction screening of HCWs for SARS-CoV was performed. SARS-CoV was examined by two nested RT-PCRs and a quantitative RT-PCR. Serum-specific antibodies were assessed by enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence. We monitored 230 HCWs, including 217 first-line HCWs and 13 non-first-line HCWs. One hundred ninety first-line HCWs and 13 non-first-line HCWs had negative results in both nested RT-PCR assays. Two first-line HCWs who were positive on both nested RT-PCR assays had SARS. They had 16,900 +/- 7,920 copies (mean +/- SD) of RNA per milliliter in the NPS and had detectable anti-SARS antibodies. The remaining 25 first-line HCWs were negative for the first nested RT-PCR but positive for the second nested RT-PCR. Their corresponding titers were 338 +/- 227 copies of RNA per milliliter; antibodies developed in none of these 25 HCWs. The expression and function of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 were not different among these HCWs. This study shows that colonization of SARS-CoV occurred in 25 of 217 well-protected first-line HCWs on a SARS-associated service, but they remained seronegative.

conclusionWith the second RT-PCR assay more sensitive than the first RT-PCR assay, we are able to show that approximately 11.5% of well-protected HCWs exposed to SARS patients or specimens may have colonization without seroconversion. Only those with significant clinical symptoms or disease would have active immunity. Thus, regular NPS screening for nested RT-PCR assays in conjunction with a daily recording of body temperature in all first-line HCWs may provide an effective way of early detection.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalAdultAntibodies, ViralCross InfectionFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleNasopharynxRetrospective StudiesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusAntibodies, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID16424418
PMCPMC7094471
OpenAlexW2100412672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.