Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16421131›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2006

Measuring therapy adherence in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of methods.

K A Grosset, I Bone, J L Reid, D Grosset

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Adherence to raloxifene therapy: assessment methods and relationship with efficacy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K A GrossetInstitute of Neurological Sciences, Department of Neurology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF. d.grosset@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
I Bone
J L Reid
D Grosset
Southern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe objective of this study was to assess different methods of measuring therapy adherence in Parkinson's disease (PD). In a single centre observational study, 112 patients with idiopathic PD were randomised to a crossover trial of active monitoring (n = 69, simple tablet count and electronic monitoring), or to no monitoring (n = 43, control group). All patients completed a self report and visual analogue scale (VAS) indicating therapy intake. In the active monitoring group, 56 (81% of cases) used > or = 80% of their medication, and 13 (19% of cases) used <80%, based on electronic monitoring. Median adherence for self report was 100% (interquartile range (IQR) 100 to 100) and for VAS was 100% (IQR 95 to 100), in both active and control groups. Patients taking > or = 80% of prescribed medication had a median total adherence of 98% (IQR 93 to 101) by electronic monitoring, which was similar to that from other

methodsself report 100%, IQR 100 to 100; VAS 100%, IQR 95 to 100; simple tablet count 98%, IQR 89 to 100. Median total adherence in patients taking <80% of medication was significantly lower by electronic monitoring (69%, IQR 44 to 74) than by other methods: self report 100%, IQR 100 to 100; VAS 100%, IQR 95 to 100; and simple tablet count 90%, IQR 78 to 100 (all p<0.0001). Sensitivities of self report (10%), VAS (17%), and simple tablet count (50%) were all low for detecting suboptimal medicine intake. Self report, VAS, and simple tablet counts are insensitive as predictors of suboptimal medicine usage in PD. How patients take their medicines influences interpretation of the therapy response and consequent management decisions, with implications for clinical trial analysis and clinical practice.

Indexed as

MicrocomputersPatient ComplianceAgedAntiparkinson AgentsCross-Over StudiesData CollectionDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMathematical ComputingMental Status ScheduleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationParkinson DiseaseProspective StudiesAntiparkinson Agents

Identifiers

PMID16421131
PMCPMC2077597
OpenAlexW2142270985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.