Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16418872›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2006

Preliminary experience with a terpene mixture versus ibuprofen for treatment of category III chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Choong Bum Lee, U-Syn Ha, Seung Ju Lee, Sae Woong Kim, Yong-Hyun Cho

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Chronic Primary Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Men.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
  6. Analgesic Potential of Terpenes Derived fromPharmacological reviews · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Choong Bum LeeDepartment of Urology, St. Vincent Hospital, Catholic University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
U-Syn Ha
Seung Ju Lee
Sae Woong Kim
Yong-Hyun Cho
St. Vincent's Hospital · KRSeoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRYang Hospital · KRYeouido St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of a terpene mixture (rowatinex) compared to ibuprofen, patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) were randomly selected to either receive rowatinex 200 mg t.i.d. or ibuprofen 600 mg t.i.d. After a 6-week treatment, the decrease in the mean total NIH-CPSI score was significant in both groups from 21.4 to 15.3, (6.1 (p < 0.01) and from 21.2 to 16.8, (4.4 (p = 0.04) in the rowatinex and ibuprofen group, respectively. The rate of definite improvement as defined as 25% improvement in the total score was superior (p = 0.04) in the rowatinex group (68%) versus the ibuprofen group (40%). Judging from these results, rowatinex gave significant symptomatic relief and may be of benefit for many men diagnosed with CP/CPPS. Further, including the placebo-controlled studies are necessary to define its role in the management of this difficult to treat disease.

Indexed as

AdultChi-Square DistributionChronic DiseaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Status IndicatorsHumansIbuprofenMalePelvic PainProbabilityProstatitisRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSingle-Blind MethodIbuprofenRowatinexTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID16418872
OpenAlexW1988368113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.