Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16418529›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2006

Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

M J Espy, J R Uhl, L M Sloan, S P Buckwalter, M F Jones, E A Vetter, J D C Yao, N L Wengenack, J E Rosenblatt, F R Cockerill and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 423 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
423citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
31.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

423 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Development and Laboratory Evaluation of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in biosensors for bacterial detection and identification.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

363 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J EspyMayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Hilton 470, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. espy.mark@mayo.edu
J R Uhl
L M Sloan
S P Buckwalter
M F Jones
E A Vetter
J D C Yao
N L Wengenack
J E Rosenblatt
F R Cockerill
T F Smith
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time PCR has revolutionized the way clinical microbiology laboratories diagnose many human microbial infections. This testing method combines PCR chemistry with fluorescent probe detection of amplified product in the same reaction vessel. In general, both PCR and amplified product detection are completed in an hour or less, which is considerably faster than conventional PCR detection methods. Real-time PCR assays provide sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of conventional PCR combined with Southern blot analysis, and since amplification and detection steps are performed in the same closed vessel, the risk of releasing amplified nucleic acids into the environment is negligible. The combination of excellent sensitivity and specificity, low contamination risk, and speed has made real-time PCR technology an appealing alternative to culture- or immunoassay-based testing methods for diagnosing many infectious diseases. This review focuses on the application of real-time PCR in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesOligonucleotide ProbesBacterial InfectionsHumansInfectionsMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan InfectionsVirus DiseasesOligonucleotide Probes

Identifiers

PMID16418529
PMCPMC1360278
OpenAlexW2158894328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.