Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2006
Double-blind pilot study of mesalamine vs. placebo for treatment of chronic diarrhea and nonspecific colitis in immunocompetent HIV patients.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Antibiotic and Antiinflammatory Therapy Transiently Reduces Inflammation and Hypercoagulation in Acutely SIV-Infected Pigtailed Macaques.PLoS pathogens · 2016Article
- Persistent immune activation in chronic HIV infection: do any interventions work?AIDS (London, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic diarrhea and colitis are common in patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) under highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). This prospective double-blind study explores the effect of mesalamine vs. placebo in HIV-positive patients. Thirteen HIV-infected patients with noninfectious chronic diarrhea and > 250 CD4+ cells/mm(3) were randomized to mesalamine (2.4 g/day; n = 9) or placebo (n = 4) for 6 weeks. Colonoscopy was performed at baseline and week 6, and biopsies were obtained to calculate the Biopsy Activity Index (BAI). Diarrhea was assessed at baseline and end of treatment using the Disease Activity Index (DAI). Patients and clinicians completed Patient Global Improvement index (PGI) and Clinical Global Improvement index (CGI) at weeks 2 and 6. Comparisons at week 6 were statistically significant between mesalamine and placebo groups for BAI (P = 0.03), DAI (P = 0.007), PGI (P = 0.008), and CGI (P = 0.008). Furthermore, major improvements were documented in the mesalamine group at week 6 compared to baseline for all variables, whereas the placebo group did not have any. Mesalamine was effective for treatment of chronic diarrhea and moderate nonspecific colitis in HIV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.