Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16416142›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2006

[Peyronie's disease. Conservative and surgical therapy].

E W Hauck, T Diemer, W Weidner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E W HauckKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg. ekkehard.w.hauck@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de
T Diemer
W Weidner
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Andrologie · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peyronie's disease is characterized by the formation of a plaque of the tunica albuginea that leads to a mainly dorsally directed penile curvature and penile shortening due to scarification. The exact ethiopathology remains unclear. The natural history of the disease is variable, ranging from spontaneous remissions to chronic, and including severe penile curvature. Therapy should be conservative in the early, painful, progressive phase. No conservative medical or semi-invasive treatment modality, such as extracorporeal shock wave therapy or radiation therapy, is currently available for curing all of the symptoms of this disorder in all patients. All studies with a controlled design showed poor therapeutic outcomes that are frequently identical to the natural course. Surgical therapy should only be performed in the stable stage of the disease. This means that Peyronie's disease should have been present for at least 12 months, and the patient should not have suffered from pain or the progression of symptoms for at least 6 months. The surgical treatment modalities comprise plication procedures (Essed-Schroeder, Nesbit), plaque-incisions with grafting, and the insertion of penile implants with simultaneous correction of the curvature by "penile cracking" or incisions of the plaque.

Indexed as

HumansLithotripsyMalePenile IndurationPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'RadiotherapyTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male

Identifiers

PMID16416142
OpenAlexW182677566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.