ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2006
Exclusion/confirmation of ataxia-telangiectasia via cell-cycle testing.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer in Children With Fanconi Anemia and Ataxia-Telangiectasia-A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study in Germany.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Article
- Characterisation of ATM mutations in Slavic Ataxia telangiectasia patients.Neuromolecular medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) is an autosomal recessive multisystem disorder with increased radiosensitivity and cancer susceptibility. The responsible gene (ATM) consists of 66 exons and a coding region of 9171 bp which precludes direct sequencing as a screening assay for confirmation or exclusion of the clinical suspicion of AT. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 330 patients referred for the exclusion of AT were exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) and incubated for 72 h in the presence of phytohemagglutinin. Using bivariate BrdU-Hoechst/ethidium bromide flowcytometry, the following cell cycle parameters were ascertained: (1) proportion of non-proliferating (G0,G1) cells as a measure of mitogen response, (2) proportion of first-cycle G2-phase cells relative to the growth fraction (G2/GF) as a measure of radiosensitivity. Of the cases tested, 94.2% could be unequivocally assigned either to the AT-negative or the AT-positive group of patients. Of the AT-positive cases, 11 were confirmed by ATM mutation analysis. Nineteen cases presented with non-conclusive results, mostly due to poor mitogen response; however, a combination of cell-cycle data with serum AFP concentrations led to the exclusion of AT in all but two of the uncertain cases. Substitution of ionizing radiation by the radiomimetic bleomycin was additionally tested in a small series of patients. We conclude that cell-cycle testing complemented by serum AFP measurements fulfills the criteria as a rapid and economical screening procedure for the differential diagnosis of juvenile ataxias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16411093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.