ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Evaluating and implementing new services.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of the health transformation plan on cesarean section in Iran: a systematic review of the literature.BMC research notes · 2019Pooled it
- Effects and costs of implementing predictive risk stratification in primary care: a randomised stepped wedge trial.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Trial
- Programme theories to describe how different general practitioner service models work in different contexts in or alongside emergency departments (GP-ED): realist evaluation.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2024Article
- Is bureaucracy being busted in research ethics and governance for health services research in the UK? Experiences and perspectives reported by stakeholders through an online survey.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Understanding the factors influencing implementation of a new national patient safety policy in England: Lessons from 'learning from deaths'.Journal of health services research & policy · 2023Article
- Identifying safe care processes when GPs work in or alongside emergency departments: a realist evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- The hepatitis C virus in Iran: health policy, historical, ethical issues and future challenges.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Developing a framework of quality indicators for healthcare business cases: a qualitative document analysis consolidating insight from expert guidance and current practice.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- The Italian Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) study: A cross sectional survey.PloS one · 2019Article
- How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study.Implementation science : IS · 2013Article
- A method for addressing research gaps in HTA, developed whilst evaluating robotic-assisted surgery: a proposal.Health research policy and systems · 2010Article
- Impact of same-day appointments on patient satisfaction with general practice appointment systems.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- NHS Direct did not emerge from an evidence free void.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Introducing new health interventions: diagnostics is the Cinderella of health technology assessment.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Introducing new health interventions.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.