ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and management in primary care.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Primary care practitioners' experiences managing urinary tract infections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Global prevalence of antibiotic resistance in paediatric urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and association with routine use of antibiotics in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Does clinical examination aid in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC family practice · 2011Pooled it
- A Randomized Comparative Study of Luteolin-Based Herbal Unani FormulationsCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025Trial
- Article
- Current Scientific Advances in Vaccines Against UTIs: Challenges and Prospects.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Lodestar DX: a comparison with traditional culture for the detection of bacteriuria in the workup of urinary tract infection.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- U.S. primary care physician perceptions on barriers to providing guideline-driven care for UTI and recurrent UTI: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- High antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infections in male outpatients in routine laboratory data, Germany, 2015 to 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022Observational
- Occurrence and Genomic Characterization of Clone ST1193 Clonotype 14-64 in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Escherichia coli in Spain.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- A Three-Year Look at the Phylogenetic Profile, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Associated Virulence Genes of UropathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antibiotic-functionalized gold nanoparticles for the detection of active β-lactamases.Nanoscale advances · 2022Article
- Article
- Lower Urinary Tract Infections: Management, Outcomes and Risk Factors for Antibiotic Re-prescription in Primary Care.EClinicalMedicine · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- An evaluation of E. coli in urinary tract infection in emergency department at KAMC in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: retrospective study.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2018Article
- Association between antibiotic use among pregnant women with urinary tract infections in the first trimester and birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study 1997 to 2011.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2016Article
- Evaluation of the appropriate time period between sampling and analyzing for automated urinalysis.Biochemia medica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.