ReviewEpidemiology and infection2006
Vaccines for cervical cancer.
Review in Epidemiology and infection, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Tumor Suppressor BRCA1/2, Cancer Susceptibility and Genome Instability in Gynecological and Mammary Cancers.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Review
- Potential anticancer effect of aspirin and 2'-hydroxy-2,3,5'-trimethoxychalcone-linked polymeric micelles against cervical cancer through apoptosis.Oncology letters · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and Risk Factors of Advantage Cancers in Ethiopia.Journal of cancer prevention · 2019Article
- Factors associated with human papillomavirus infection - findings from a cervical cancer screening program for female employees in Beijing.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus infection among women in northeastern Guangdong Province of China.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Ethical considerations of universal vaccination against human papilloma virus.BMC medical ethics · 2014Article
- Identification of a better Homo sapiens Class II HDAC inhibitor through binding energy calculations and descriptor analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Public knowledge and attitudes towards Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination.BMC public health · 2008Article
- Attitudes and perceptions towards HPV vaccination among young women in Saudi Arabia.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The review focuses on current and future prevention of invasive cervical cancer (ICC), the second most common cancer among women worldwide. Implementation of population-based cytological screening programmes, using the 'Pap' smear to detect pre-cancerous lesions in the cervix, has resulted in substantial declines in mortality and morbidity from ICC in North America and some European countries. However, cases of, and deaths from, ICC continue to occur. Primary prevention of infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types, the central causal factor of ICC, could further reduce incidence of and mortality from ICC. This is particularly the case in developing countries, which bear 80% of the burden of ICC, and where effective Pap screening programmes are extremely difficult to implement. Very promising results from several trials of synthetic HPV type-specific monovalent (HPV 16) and bivalent (HPV 16 and 18) vaccines have recently been published, showing high efficacy against type-specific persistent HPV infection and development of type-specific pre-cancerous lesions. Large-scale phase III trials of a number of such vaccine candidates are currently underway, and there is real hope that an effective vaccine capable of protecting against infection with HPV types 16 and 18 (which together account for approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide), and thereby of preventing development of a very significant proportion of cases of ICC, could be available within the next 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.