ArticleDer Pathologe2006
[Drug-induced pulmonary damage].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Drug-induced disorders of the lung parenchyma].Der Pneumologe · 2009Article
- [Drug-induced pulmonary diseases].Der Pneumologe · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The frequency of drug-induced damage to the lung in inpatients is estimated to be about 10%. Pathoanatomically, varying damage patterns result, ranging from acute pulmonary edema via inflammatory reactions to pulmonary fibrosis. The ATS/ERS 2001 classification, which is based on the suggestions made by Liebow 1969, is an accepted system for classifying findings according to recurring patterns. Generally, there are no specific morphological findings which allow safe conclusions on possible administered drugs. Clinical information is mandatory. Differentiation from pulmonary alterations due to the underlying disease is often difficult. In daily routine diagnostics, it is important to consider iatrogenic causal factors in cases of "undetermined pulmonary disease".
Indexed as
Identifiers
16408165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.