ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2006
Attempted forced titration of blood pressure to <130/85 mm Hg in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients in clinical practice: the diastolic cost.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty about the systolic blood pressure target in people with diabetes.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Article
- Challenges and risks in attaining the systolic blood pressure goal of <130 mm Hg in all diabetic patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors assessed the practicality and results of forced titrating of blood pressure to <130/85 mm Hg based on guidelines of the sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in the setting of a clinical practice in 257 diabetic, hypertensive patients. Goal diastolic pressure was achieved in 90% of the patients, but goal systolic pressure was achieved in only 33%. In 57% of the patients, the attained diastolic pressure was < or =70 mm Hg, and in 20% of the cohort diastolic pressure was reduced to <70 mm Hg (mean, 60+/-1 mm Hg). Patients with final diastolic pressure <70 mm Hg were older, had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease, and higher initial systolic and pulse pressures compared with patients with final diastolic pressure of 71-85 mm Hg. Thus, attempted lowering of blood pressure to <130/85 mm Hg is associated with excessive lowering of diastolic pressure in a significant number of patients. Whether the benefits of tight systolic control outweigh the risks of excessive diastolic reduction requires further prospective assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.