ArticleGut2006
CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies.
Article in Gut, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
171 citing papers in PubMed, 360 citations in OpenAlex.
- RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic high-methylated colorectal cancer has gene expression patterns related to MSI-H and BRAF V600E mutant: a translational research.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota in cancer initiation, development and therapy.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- New Insights into Colorectal Cancer through the Lens of Precision Oncology and Personalized Medicine: Multi-Omics Helps Aging of Predisposed People.Current aging science · 2025Review
- The combination of CDX2 expression status and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density as a prognostic factor in adjuvant FOLFOX-treated patients with stage III colorectal cancers.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Immune microenvironmental heterogeneity according to tumor DNA methylation phenotypes in microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancers.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Epigenetic reprogramming in gastrointestinal cancer: biology and translational perspectives.MedComm · 2024Review
- Whole-Genome DNA Methylation Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Reveals Prognostic Subtypes with Distinct Biological Drivers.Cancer research · 2024Article
- Epigenetic MLH1 silencing concurs with mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic, naturally occurring colorectal cancer in rhesus macaques.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications.Cancer treatment and research · 2024Review
- How Can the Microbiome Induce Carcinogenesis and Modulate Drug Resistance in Cancer Therapy?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Expression Pattern of DAB Adaptor Protein 2 in Left- and Right-Side Colorectal Carcinoma.Genes · 2023Article
- Overexpression of synaptic vesicle protein Rab GTPase 3C promotes vesicular exocytosis and drug resistance in colorectal cancer cells.Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Acute lymphoblastic leukemia displays a distinct highly methylated genome.Nature cancer · 2022Article
- Serrated Colorectal Lesions: An Up-to-Date Review from Histological Pattern to Molecular Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- A modified MethyLight assay predicts the clinical outcomes of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Mucinous adenocarcinoma: A unique clinicopathological subtype in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- The HROC-Xenobank-A High Quality Assured PDX Biobank of >100 Individual Colorectal Cancer Models.Cancers · 2021Article
111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is not universally accepted. Even if specific clinicopathological features have been associated with CIMP, investigators often failed to demonstrate a bimodal distribution of the number of methylated markers, which would suggest CIMP as a distinct subtype of colorectal cancer. Previous studies primarily used methylation specific polymerase chain reaction which might detect biologically insignificant low levels of methylation.
aimTo demonstrate a distinct genetic profile of CIMP colorectal cancer using quantitative DNA methylation analysis that can distinguish high from low levels of DNA methylation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (MethyLight) assays and measured DNA methylation (percentage of methylated reference) of five carefully selected loci (promoters of CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, MLH1, and NEUROG1) in 460 colorectal cancers from large prospective cohorts.
resultsThere was a clear bimodal distribution of 80 microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours according to the number of methylated promoters, with no tumours showing 3/5 methylated loci. Thus we defined CIMP as having >or=4/5 methylated loci, and 17% (78) of the 460 tumours were classified as CIMP. CIMP was significantly associated with female sex, MSI, BRAF mutations, and wild-type KRAS. Both CIMP MSI-H tumours and CIMP microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours showed much higher frequencies of BRAF mutations (63% and 54%) than non-CIMP counterparts (non-CIMP MSI-H (0%, p<10(-5)) and non-CIMP MSS tumours (6.6%, p<10(-4)), respectively).
conclusionCIMP is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis. CIMP is a distinct epigenotype of colorectal cancer and may be less frequent than previously reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.