Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16407331›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2006

Linking uracil base excision repair and 5-fluorouracil toxicity in yeast.

Lauren Seiple, Pawel Jaruga, Miral Dizdaroglu, James T Stivers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. An efficient transformation system for Trichoderma atroviride using the pyr4 gene as a selectable marker.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improved Radiotherapy Sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells by miR-29-3p Targeting COL1A1 3'-UTR.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Nuclear Folate Metabolism.Annual review of nutrition · 2018
    Review
  17. Targeting nuclear thymidylate biosynthesis.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Populations adapt to fluctuating selection using derived and ancestral allelic diversity.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren SeipleDepartment of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Pawel Jaruga
Miral Dizdaroglu
James T Stivers

Funding

Uracil Damage Recognition by Uracil DNA GlyocosylaseR01GM056834 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI STIVERS, JAMES T. · 1998 to 2021
$8.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM56834-10NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a widely used anticancer drug that disrupts pyrimidine nucleotide pool balances and leads to uracil incorporation in DNA, which is then recognized and removed by the uracil base excision repair (BER) pathway. Using complementary biochemical and genetic approaches we have examined the role of uracil BER in the cell killing mechanism of 5-FU. A yeast strain lacking the enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (Ung1), which excises uracil from the DNA backbone leaving an abasic site, showed significant protection against the toxic effects of 5-FU, a G1/S cell cycle arrest phenotype, and accumulated massive amounts of U/A base pairs in its genome (approximately 4% of T/A pairs were now U/A). A strain lacking the major abasic site endonuclease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Apn1) showed significantly increased sensitivity to 5-FU with G2/M arrest. Thus, efficient processing of abasic sites by this enzyme is protective against the toxic effects of 5-FU. However, contrary to expectations, the Apn1 deficient strain did not accumulate intact abasic sites, indicating that another repair pathway attempts to process these sites in the absence Apn1, but that this process has catastrophic effects on genome integrity. These findings suggest that new strategies for chemical intervention targeting BER could enhance the effectiveness of this widely used anticancer drug.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell CycleDNA, FungalFluorouracilRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeUracilAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDNA, FungalFluorouracilRNA, FungalUracil

Identifiers

PMID16407331
PMCPMC1326247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.