Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16404363›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2006

Macrophages promote angiogenesis in human breast tumour spheroids in vivo.

L Bingle, C E Lewis, K P Corke, M W R Reed, N J Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Vascularized Tissue Organoids.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Methods for vascularization and perfusion of tissue organoids.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L BingleMicrocirculation Research Group, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
C E Lewis
K P Corke
M W R Reed
N J Brown

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2000:118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An in vivo model has been established to study the role of macrophages in the initiation of angiogenesis by human breast tumour spheroids in vivo. The extent of the angiogenic response induced by T47D spheroids implanted into the dorsal skinfold chamber in nude mice was measured in vivo and compared to that induced by spheroids infiltrated with human macrophages prior to implantation. Our results indicate that the presence of macrophages in spheroids resulted in at least a three-fold upregulation in the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in vitro when compared with spheroids composed only of tumour cells. The angiogenic response measured around the spheroids, 3 days after in vivo implantation, was significantly greater in the spheroids infiltrated with macrophages. The number of vessels increased (macrophages vs no macrophages 34+/-1.9 vs 26+/-2.5, P<0.01), were shorter in length (macrophages vs no macrophages 116+/-4.92 vs 136+/-6.52, P<0.008) with an increased number of junctions (macrophages vs no macrophages 14+/-0.93 vs 11+/-1.25, P<0.025) all parameters indicative of new vessel formation. This is the first study to demonstrate a role for macrophages in the initiation of tumour angiogenesis in vivo.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMacrophagesMiceMice, NudeSpheroids, CellularTransplantation, HeterologousTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

PMID16404363
PMCPMC2361081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.