ReviewVeterinary research communications2006
Cultural and Immunological Detection Methods for Salmonella spp. in Animal Feeds - A Review.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced biosensing strategies for high-risk foodborne pathogens: a comprehensive review ofFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A highly sensitive point-of-care detection platform for Salmonella typhimurium by integrating magnetic enrichment and fluorescent CsPbBrMikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Buffering Capacity Comparison of Tris Phosphate Carbonate and Buffered Peptone WaterAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Application of microbial analyses to feeds and potential implications for poultry nutrition.Poultry science · 2022Review
- Advancement inBiosensors · 2021Review
- Selected Instrumental Techniques Applied in Food and Feed: Quality, Safety and Adulteration Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Review
- Developments in Rapid Detection Methods for the Detection of FoodborneFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Prevention of Salmonella contamination of finished soybean meal used for animal feed by a Norwegian production plant despite frequent Salmonella contamination of raw soy beans, 1994-2012.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2014Article
- Estimation of costs for control of Salmonella in high-risk feed materials and compound feed.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2014Article
- Micro ecosystems from feed industry surfaces: a survival and biofilm study of Salmonella versus host resident flora strains.BMC veterinary research · 2010Article
- Accuracy and sensitivity of commercial PCR-based methods for detection of Salmonella enterica in feed.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010Article
- A comparative study of cultural methods for the detection of Salmonella in feed and feed ingredients.BMC veterinary research · 2009Article
- Development of rapid detection and genetic characterization of salmonella in poultry breeder feeds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2009Article
- Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination on hides and carcasses of cull cattle presented for slaughter in the United States: an evaluation of prevalence and bacterial loads by immunomagnetic separation and direct plating methods.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2008Article
- SEL, a selective enrichment broth for simultaneous growth of Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2008Article
- Microbiological risk assessment in feedingstuffs for food-producing animals - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2008Article
- What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health.Environmental health perspectives · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-borne salmonellosis continues to be a major public health concern, and contamination with Salmonella spp. in pre-harvest animal production is considered a primary contributor to this problem. Animal feeds can easily become contaminated during primary production, feed mixing and processing as well as during feeding. Consequently, monitoring and surveillance of feeds and feed ingredients for Salmonella spp. contamination may be useful or necessary in the prevention and control of this organism. Cultural and immunological detection methods for salmonellae have been used or suggested as possible approaches for use in animal feeds. Cultural methods remain advantageous owing to their ability to detect viable bacterial cells, while immunological methods have the capability of detecting nonculturable bacterial cells. Advancements and improvements in both methodologies offer opportunities for eventual routine use of these detection technologies in animal feed assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.