Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16398468›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical focus2005

Genetics of pituitary adenomas: current theories and future implications.

Jay Jagannathan, Aaron S Dumont, Daniel M Prevedello, Beatriz Lopes, Rod J Oskouian, John A Jane, Edward R Laws

RetractedAbstract readRetracted PublicationReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical focus, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Familial isolated pituitary adenomas: from genetics to therapy.Clinical and translational science · 2011
    Review
  7. Variations in referral patterns for hypophysectomies among pediatric patients with sellar and parasellar tumors.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2010
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2011-02-01Investigation by ORI · Misconduct - Official Investigation(s) and/or Finding(s) · Misconduct by Author · Plagiarism of/in Article · · Jay Jagannathan has ORI finding of misconduct: see https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-12-011.html;
  • Commented on by
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay JagannathanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Aaron S Dumont
Daniel M Prevedello
Beatriz Lopes
Rod J Oskouian
John A Jane
Edward R Laws

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary tumors are often viewed as benign entities that are rarely associated with significant rates of mortality or morbidity. These tumors can still be extremely difficult to manage, however, and can cause significant morbidity to the patient, both from tumor mass effect and secondary to hormonal imbalances.

Indexed as

AdenomaAnimalsForecastingGenetic TherapyHumansPituitary Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID16398468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.